|
|
Post by dreamergirl on Apr 9, 2006 14:15:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Shenzi on Apr 9, 2006 15:13:07 GMT -5
Peter Pan 2 was bad enough IMO.  |
|
|
|
Post by Mrs. Nesbit on Apr 9, 2006 16:56:09 GMT -5
The storyline sounds rather good. It would be nice to see how Peter and the lost boys got to Never Land, however, I do not think that it should be CGI at all  |
|
|
|
Post by Skeleton Grin on Apr 9, 2006 17:48:17 GMT -5
Neither do I. That just sounds ridiculous. It's like doing Toy Story 3 in Cell animation.
|
|
Sadako
Disney Grandmaster
[M:0]
Posts: 770
|
Post by Sadako on Apr 10, 2006 16:05:02 GMT -5
I don;t think we need a whole story about how they get to Neveland. In the book it takes up maybe one paragragh. If they do make it, it better not be in cgi.
|
|
|
|
Post by angiealight on Apr 10, 2006 21:39:50 GMT -5
All I have to say is... Eeeeee ... Maybe they'll surprise us, and it'll be good, but I'm doubtful right now. Angie-the-sequel-phobic  |
|
|
|
Post by Shenzi on Apr 10, 2006 21:53:20 GMT -5
All I have to say is... Eeeeee ... Maybe they'll surprise us, and it'll be good, but I'm doubtful right now. Angie-the-sequel-phobic i am highly doubious that its going to be any good. i thought the second one was dumb enough. and who cares about how they got to Neverland, the point is they did. if it really mattered they would have put a small segment dedicated to it in the first one before showing the Darling family. |
|
disneygirl
Disney Newbie
Tale as old as time..
Posts: 51
|
Post by disneygirl on Apr 11, 2006 22:02:52 GMT -5
The storyline sounds rather good. It would be nice to see how Peter and the lost boys got to Never Land, however, I do not think that it should be CGI at all I agree. Not only do I hate CGI animation, but for Peter Pan? Thats going too far. |
|
|
|
Post by Mrs. Nesbit on Apr 14, 2006 12:27:07 GMT -5
The storyline sounds rather good. It would be nice to see how Peter and the lost boys got to Never Land, however, I do not think that it should be CGI at all I agree. Not only do I hate CGI animation, but for Peter Pan? Thats going too far. I have nothing against the making of this movie as I find it very intersting to know where Peter Pan actually came from. I just dont agree with the CGI bit... that's just as bad as Mickey's Twice Upon a Christmas, which was a good movie but the animation was yucky. |
|
|
|
Post by Vicky on Apr 19, 2006 13:36:48 GMT -5
I don't understand why you don't like "Return to Neverland"? but that's everyones own opinion, i guess I love Peter Pan and I def. wanna see it. I'd love to know where Peter Pan came from. I'm not gonna say it's bad or good if I even didn't see it yet. maybe they'll surprise us !  I just don't know about CGI, I've been such a great fan of it  aah well... we'll see... |
|
thekillerbomb
Disney Newbie
And always let your conscious be your guide
Posts: 12
|
Post by thekillerbomb on Apr 19, 2006 13:43:09 GMT -5
I love Peter Pan. I remember the first one. Like it was yesterday...
|
|
|
|
Post by Shenzi on Apr 19, 2006 18:15:49 GMT -5
I don't understand why you don't like "Return to Neverland"? but that's everyones own opinion, i guess I love Peter Pan and I def. wanna see it. I'd love to know where Peter Pan came from. I'm not gonna say it's bad or good if I even didn't see it yet. maybe they'll surprise us ! I just don't know about CGI, I've been such a great fan of it aah well... we'll see... it wasn't the worst sequal of disney's, i'll give it that. i did find it cute and i have the soundtrack becasue i love the songs, i just didn't care for it the best. that's all. |
|
|
|
Post by poohbear on Apr 21, 2006 15:35:19 GMT -5
Good gosh, another one??? l  like the first two weren't bad enough....uhhhh |
|
|
|
Post by Butterscotch on Apr 21, 2006 21:44:46 GMT -5
I dunno about this one. I love Peter Pan, but part of the fun is the mystery of who they were before they became Peter Pan and the Lost Boys, especially Peter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Twilight fan on Apr 22, 2006 10:45:34 GMT -5
This may be a dumb question but whats cgi???
|
|
